Settings and activity
9 results found
-
6 votes
asmith
supported this idea
·
-
18 votes
An error occurred while saving the comment -
10 votes
An error occurred while saving the comment asmith
commented
Hi Thomas,
A new set of minimal templates are being actively worked on and will be released in a fairly imminent version of solusvm.
-
5 votes
An error occurred while saving the comment asmith
commented
The issue here is that it is quite possible and not at all uncommon for 1 container to get out of control and push the 1m5m15m load of all other containers on the node high through various waits and conditions.
Should SolusVM implement this I think there is a danger of a lot of false positive conditions.
I would suggest instead that you consider tuning your domain0 and setting real cpu and iops limits per container, this incidentally is something that may be considered.
An error occurred while saving the comment asmith
commented
Thanks for the suggestion, can you confirm you are referring to OpenVZ specifically?
-
5 votesasmith
supported this idea
·
-
25 votes
An error occurred while saving the comment asmith
commented
Hi Brandon,
Thanks for the suggestion, for clarity and to make sure I understand you correctly the process you would like would be:
1) Add network block and have the ability to select an 'IP Pool' or 'IP Group'
2) When adding a new slave/node to the SolusVM master select the 'IP Pool/Group' at the same time.
Then you can add a new network block to the pool without having to manually assign the correct individual servers.
Do I have that right?
-
12 votes
An error occurred while saving the comment asmith
commented
There are no plans currently to start supporting LXC however VZ7+KVM may be considered if the demand is there.
-
29 votes
An error occurred while saving the comment asmith
commented
Thanks for the feedback Chad,
A new UI, certainly user facing in the first instance will be released with the next major release.
-
64 votes
An error occurred while saving the comment asmith
commented
Hi Joel,
Acronis seems to have limited options for backups and restores when it comes to LVM without significant disruption.
Additionally it also seems to run completely independently with its own management UI.
perhaps I am missing something are you able to provide a link to the specific Acronis product/version you have in mind?
An error occurred while saving the comment asmith
commented
Hi Chris,
For clarity are you looking for an option to do backups to a separate local volume in the same physical server or over the WAN/LAN or both?
Obviously there are some challenges with both in terms of generating IO wait or link saturation while transferring multiple TB's of data.
r1Soft is already an option with no further integration required via the r1soft Server backup manager, what sort of integration would you like to see, please be as detailed as possible.
Obviously backups in general have become a popular request so it is important to understand the most likely use cases and methods by hosts to get this right.
Hi Thomas,
This is being considered for the next major release.